Sociological imagination is defined as having the insight to see that the world/any given situation extends beyond the individual. That is to say we can consider other external factors such as politics, economy, government and so forth. For me, my thoughts on globalization and social justice were greatly altered as a result of this concept. For starters, I saw globalization and social justice from a very black and white perspective. Globalization was something that made the world turn and it was exclusively beneficial to the power elite and much like globalization, social justice was something that was decided by the upper crust of society. After all it is the upper echelons of power who determine what is considered right and wrong. Despite all the news we hear about the horrible effects of globalization on regular people like me. I believed social justice was the counter weight which kept globalization in check. However, after realizing and understanding the concept of the sociological imagination I realize this is not necessarily so. In addition I realize that as much as I may think the world unfair with one group of people profiting off capitalist ventures which do harm to another person’s life I realize it is an unfortunate zero sum game we all take part in.

 

For instance, globalization generally involves the economic gain of a developed country by utilizing goods and services on a global scale hence the root word global. This was made abundately clear when Professor Charles mentioned how once he got a taste for Quaker Oatmeal he no longer wanted any oatmeal made locally, what this meant was that he was indirectly and unknowingly supporting the globalization engine. In addition I realized that the majority of everything I buy is a direct result of globalization, one such example is cocoa beans, people in Ghana work to cultivate the cocoa beans which become chocolate bars that we buy, at the same time the money earned from the cultivation and selling of cocoa beans helps support the community. This made me look at all my local goods from a whole different perspective. If I go into a corner store and buy a bottle of coke all I have to do is pay for it and drink it, now however, I am able to see the larger picture and realize that a bunch of minimum waged laborers in a developing country like Mexico had to bottle and assemble this in a factory somewhere. Afterwards it had to be shipped and agreements on how much tariff’s this shipment of cola was going to cost had to be agreed upon. In short, I’m now able to see and understand the collective efforts of merchandise be it food or technology and appreciate it so much more.

 

The same opinion about social justice can be said. For the longest time I thought of social justice very plainly. If you were being subjected to it you must have done something wrong. But now I’ve come to see social justice is more about just right and wrong and how it protects me as an individual. It takes into consideration the wishes of a collective group of people and works to better serve those people. Also, seeing videos of countries and there interpretation of justice it makes me think perhaps there is a better method than just incarceration. Does locking someone up serve my needs and the need of that individual? Or is it better to use a method like restorative justice which seeks to heal the wounds of both offender and victim? A clear example of this was illustrated in the video about the Gacaca justice system. Rather than trying to deter crime through incareration this system operates on mediation between victim and offender because it’s the belief that finding out why this happend is more important than simply stopping the crime in that one instance. This concept has opened my eyes to new possibilities and has taught me to ask questions and seek alternatives because I understand now that there is always another way to do something and I shouldn’t be afarid to speak my mind.

 

Video 3:

In the Shadows of the Kremlin…

Paraphrastic Method

 

 

The definition of “norms” from a sociological perspective is defined as accepted/agreed upon behavior in a given society. Such norms include respecting your elders, not stealing etc. But what happens when the norm of a given society is alienating another group of people based on race? That’s the question this documentary attempts to answer. There was a period of intense racism in Russia where people of African descent were treated less than fairly. Through various interviews with families/people that have experienced this first hand we are shown what happens when the society you live in does not accept you.

 

What’s more surprising in this documentary is how people have come to accept this mode of thinking as the natural way of life, this is evident in some of the local citizens that are interviewed. One old man stated that if the president were black he would go as far as leaving Russia. Even the youths have been indoctrinated with this racist mentality as many state that the natural order of life is to live in your birth country. It is truly a sad sight to see as there was no one to fight this backlash and offer an alternative means of thinking. Regrettably, due to the in stringent laws of the country individuals of African descent were not allowed to leave. The racist atmosphere can be attributed to the fact that Russians knew little of African people. As human nature has demonstrated in the past what people don’t understand they fear and hate.

 

Paraphrase

The end of World War II did not bring peace all around the world. Russia was going through an ethnocentric phase where if you were anything but Russian (in particular of African descent) you were in a precarious situation because the general population despised you. Efforts to quell this mentality were non-existent because that was the norm of society. As demonstrated in the video, even the media/literature at the time was not very helpful as it painted people of African descent in a very negative light. This is a clear cut example of what happens when healthy dialogue/communication amongst different ethnic classes is not promoted. People will depend on stereotypes and inaccurate half-truths.

 

Video 2:

Gacaca Justice System

Affective Method

 Affective Method

The purpose of this video was to demonstrate Rwanda’s restorative justice system known as the “Gacaca” justice system.  This justice system is a prime example of our very own developing restorative justice system which differs from our current system because rather than simply incarcerating our offenders with jail this method is about healing and resolution with victim and offender by promoting dialogue.

 

The Gacaca system does exactly that. There is a large community involvement. Where, if the criminals plead guilty and agree to do some community service they can avoid a lifetime of jail. I have to admit that when I heard Rwanda was implementing this method of justice I was very surprised. I’m ashamed to admit this but considering the only news about Rwanda is negative (genocide, violence etc.)  I thought this was the last country that would use such a method, I was wrong.  Although there are many things that need to be worked out before this method of justice is truly affective I’m reminded that violence cannot be stopped by more violence. We need to rethink our process and find a new method in which the need to be angry and violent is taken out of the equation. If a country like Rwanda, which has a violent history, can turn things around and operate justice from a new perspective then there is really no reason why the rest of our so called “developed” nations cannot follow suit and do the same.

Video 1:

DNA Video (Youtube)

Affective Method

 

Affective Method

A group of high school students (of different ethnic backgrounds) participated in an exercise to see the relations between DNA and ethnicity. The students were asked who they thought they would be most compatible with and much like I predicted they chose group members who resembled them physically by distinguishing physical features such as skin color. What I was amazed to see was that the results were nothing like what anyone had anticipated. If anything group members who was Caucasian had more similarities to group members who were of a different ethnic/racial descent (Hispanic, African-American etc)

 

Watching this video and hearing these results challenged the foundations of what I believed regarding race, ethnicity and DNA. Up until this video I, unknowingly, like many other people lumped ethnicities together and naturally assumed I would have more physical characteristics/features in common with someone of Asian/Korean descent then say someone of Hispanic descent. In the end I came out of this video with the belief that what differences we have are minor and if anything I’ve come to care about physical characteristics less. So what if someone is darker than me? That shouldn’t change the way I treat them. For in the end we are all part of one race, the human race.

Guest Speaker: Debbie Mellenger

Affective Method

Debbie Mellenger’s visit was of great comfort for me because up till her visit the idea of doing a fundraiser and trying to raise an amount as large as 750 dollars seemed daunting and frightening.  However, her helpful tips and suggestions broadened not only my thinking of this fundraiser but that of my entire group. Personally, for me, asking a stranger for anything seems like soliciting but Debbie’s advice about not being afraid to push a little bit was helpful. As a result I was able to branch out more from just asking family and friends for contributions. At the same time I realized that time was of the essence and I was able to use my time affectively and know when to cut my losses regarding a possible contributor. Due to the numerous ideas Debbie suggested regarding types of fundraisers my group was able to approach the task of fundraising in many different ways and although not all of them worked out at the end of the day we could at least say we left no stone unturned.

Guest Speaker(s): Under the Same Sun Representatives

Affective Method

The speakers from “Under the Same Sun” were without a doubt the turning point in my day.  Up until these guest speakers came by I had no idea that the issue of albinism was even a crisis. I knew just about as much as the average person: it’s a rare condition which leaves the person with little to no skin pigment (color) at all. I certainly had no idea that it affected their vision or that there was a global crisis where people with this affliction were being dismembered because of a cultural/supernatural voodoo belief.  In addition, I came out of this presentation realizing that there was another marginalized group in society. I say marginalized because people have little to no idea how dire this situation is, add to that the depiction of people with albinism. They are either used as a joke or completely the opposite: as some superhero firing guns in the air. I’ve watched movies where albinism was a integral part of the story but sadly it is only now that I’m realizing how inaccurate they were.

Guest Speaker: Children’s charity representative

Affective Method

This guest speaker talking about the good his organization was doing for improvished children (getting them backpacks and giving them the ability to go to school) was uplifting. Sadly, when we turn on the news and hear about regions such as Rwanda it’s always negative news about child soldiers or the poor economic state of the country. That being said it was nice to see someone working with the community to make a difference. Many people don’t get involved because they think what difference can one person make? When the guest speaker showed how much growth the organization has had since the first year that question was immediately answered for me. All people need is choices. This was made evident in the guest speaker telling us about how one sibling (who did not get into the program and as a result did not get a chance to go to school) started crying because they did not receive a backpack. Some people may say so what? This doesn’t really mean anything but I like to think of the backpack as a symbol of choice for the young children and the child who didn’t receive the backpack understands this.

Chapter 4

The Sociology of
Human Rights and Social Justice

Affective Method

Chapter four touched on the complexities of being a person living in a society. I thought when it came to this matter I knew just about all there was to know… I was quite wrong. As the chapter states, socialization is the backbone/foundation for human development. Lacking socialization may mean you may risk the likelihood of becoming a “Deviant” who lacks proper understanding of norms and thus right and wrong. I’m not sure if this is a statement I can agree with 100%. Although studies have shown the effects of not having socialization/human interaction as a child it is also true that there are numerous cases of children growing up in a well off family with all the advantages of the world only to turn out to be a delinquent.

In addition to this development there is also the important issue of integration into society. That is becoming all you can be while operating within the framework
of your human rights. The irony of this is that not all people are given equal opportunity which is why all societies have a certain level of crime. By incorporating all three of these concepts socialization, human rights and crime you have the basic elements of society. This leaves the only question: is equalityattainable or this is simply a poor man’s pipe dream? Sadly I don’t think equality within society is attainable. Social justice is put into place to balance the scales but society can only function with people at the top and the bottom.

Chapter 3:

Social Justice
and the Social Construction of Inequality and Difference

Dialectical
Method

 

Dialectical Method

What
questions

Did
the text raise?

How
did the text

Answer this?

How does the answer match my personal
beliefs/ideas?

 

 

 

Does
society operate on an “us vs them” mentality?
The
answer is yes.  Using the process of aggregation
and dichotomization (that is the separation and categorizing of people by
various factors: race/gender etc)
Without
a doubt yes. The majority of every society in the world is based on a system
with the “have’s and have’s not’s”
How
are societal inequalities perpetuated in society.
Although
there are various methods of oppression in society the most subtle method
used is enforcing “invalid ideologies” such as the idea of a superior gender
by using pseudo-science.
Although
many people believe them I have come to not believe everything I hear simply
on face value. If one were to dig into an invalid ideology they would see
there are many holes. In the matter of gender, minus some biological
differences we are essentially the same.
What,
if any are the positive benefits of stereotyping?
According
to the text on a small level stereotypes help keep order in the world and
prevent people from being burdened by the ever large amount of information.
Rather
than agreeing or disagreeing with this statement I have to ask why is having
too much information a bad thing? If anything wouldn’t having an abundance of
information better help understand each other and thus promote more dialogue
amongst one another?

Chapter 2:

Social Reality Construction

And Global
Social Justice

Dialectical Method

What questions did
the text raise?
How did the text answer this? How does the answer match my personal beliefs/ideas?

 

 

 

What is reality? Reality
or social constructionism is based on us (humans) giving meaning to

things that did not have meaning before One such example is the concept of time. Whatgoes for one society does not mean the same view will be shared in another society.

It akes absolute sense.  When I think of
the different customs/norms of society I am reminded of this very chapter.For instance in our North American culture a thumbs up is an indication of ajob well done. In certain countries like Italy for example it is the
opposite.
Who
is responsible for societal norms/social reality?
According to the Critical Constructionism theory the answer would be the power elite of society shapes their views/standards on us the minorities. I agree wth this theory as it’s something I encounter every day. One obvious
instance of this is how I give up my seat on the bus for women with babies or
the elderly. I didn’t just wake up one day and think this is what I’m going
to do it’s a standard of conduct that’s imposed by the lawmakers of society.
Respecting the chain of priorities so to speak.
What
is a social problem?
Although this question has a multi-faceted answer the book would say it’s what the power eliete choose to inform us about. I whole-heartedly agree with this statement.
The news is tailored to the interests of its consumers. In addition,
they must also consider the wishes of its affiliates and sponsors, anything
that would be damaging would most likely not be allowed to air.

Social Justice
In

Local and Global
Contexts

Chapter 1: Key
Concepts and Reocurring Themes

Paraphrastic
Method

 

Before we are able to understand the complexities regarding social justice we must
first have a firm understanding of the sociological concepts/foundation that encompass
the various issues. These concepts, better known as the “critical thinking
toolkit” all have different objectives, however, the one thing they have in
common is that they broaden our minds and give us new perspective. One such
example is the term “obvious” the irony behind this concept is it is actually
nothing like what we’ve come to know it for. In fact the central purpose of
this term is to understand an issue for more than its window dressing and look
deeper.

 

Once this base foundation is understood we can look at history and ongoing issues in
society i.e. justice or lack thereof objectively and realize that things may
not be as black and white as they seem. In addition, we can better understand
how these themes come about and ask the questions that matter: who makes the
rules, what motivations and desires shape the decisions and most importantly,
how do they affect us as citizens within that society.

 

Paraphrase

Whether we are conscious of it or not our actions are shaped by the sociological
concepts and themes outlined in the first chapter. By understanding these
concepts/themes we can look at the world from more than right and wrong
perspective. The very fact we have sociological theories is the only reason why
society is capable of rational thought and complex ideas such as “due process”

Issues in Social
Justice

Chapter 4: Driving
Discontinuance And Quality Of Life Amongst The Elderly

                                                                                                                                                          Frank Tridico et al

Affective
Reading Method

Celebrating my birthday recently and then reading this article made me realize just how
important a role age plays, not just as an individual but also in terms of how
society changes it’s perception of me. Using the terminology from the text this
breaks down into “competence” and independence, that is how capable and
trustworthy society will deem I am to do the things I take for granted now
thirty years later (driving, making things on the stove etc) it’s that feeling
of helplessness and the loss of what you once had that may diminish or lessen
the quality of life down the road.

Driving would be a big element in the quality of life because for many (myself
included) driving is equated with a sense of freedom and independence. Not only
is it the point in time where we are unencumbered by bus schedules it is also
symbolic of the fact the possibilities are endless in terms of where you want
to go. To take that away is to take a great joy out of life as the majority of
social interactions can indirectly be tied to one’s ability to operate a car. (Meeting
people, going to the mall/grocery shopping etc)

There are generally more negative associations people link to aging than positive. We
see ourselves getting weaker and slower and we back that up with statistics
that tell us citizens in certain age categories are prone to get into automobile
accidents then a younger demographic. But as the text demonstrates there is a
successful graceful way of aging and reading this chapter has changed my
outlook on the subject of age. Rather than thinking aging is a bad thing I will
look at it as a transition to another chapter in life, in addition I will put
more stock into the saying “you’re only as young as you feel”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.